The naval battle of Modern Warfare may only be 30 minutes. (Refer to the time of the Russian cruiser Moskva from being hit by a missile until it sank)
The US warship is also just a ship, not Transformers.
There is no effective missile defense exists against hypersonics in the world and Ship-based missile defense systems are even more incapable of intercepting.
Remember: Taiwan Province has no sovereignty, and Nor is it a member of International Maritime Organization(IMO), International Civil Aviation Organization(ICAO). Taiwan Province uses PRC territory, airspace and territorial sea. The entry of US armed forces into PRC's territory, airspace and territorial sea is an act of invasion and violates international law. In PRC's territorial waters, even if the PLA sank American ships, it is legal, and the US can only endure humiliation and humiliation silently.
Within a radius of 3,000-5,000 kilometers in China, the PLA has no rivals.
8 December 1987, The US once signed a treaty with Russia (USSR), that is, the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF).
The content of the treaty clearly stipulates that the US and Russia are not allowed to develop Intermediate-range ballistic missile (IRBM).
However, China has not signed this agreement (INF), so the research and development of Intermediate-range ballistic missile (IRBM) is not limited.
Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty - Wikipedia
Former agreement between the US and USSR on nuclear arms control The Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty ( INF Treaty , formally the Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles ; Russian : Договор о ликвидации ракет средней и меньшей дальности / ДРСМД, Dogovor o likvidatsiy raket sredney i menshey dalnosti / DRSMD ) was an arms control treaty between the United States and the Soviet Union (and its successor state, the Russian Federation ). US President Ronald Reagan and Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev signed the treaty on 8 December 1987. [1] [2] The US Senate approved the treaty on 27 May 1988, and Reagan and Gorbachev ratified it on 1 June 1988. [2] [3] The INF Treaty banned all of the two nations' land-based ballistic missiles , cruise missiles , and missile launchers with ranges of 500–1,000 kilometers (310–620 mi) (short medium-range) and 1,000–5,500 km (620–3,420 mi) (intermediate-range). The treaty did not apply to air- or sea-launched missiles. [4] [5] By May 1991, the nations had eliminated 2,692 missiles, followed by 10 years of on-site verification inspections. [6] Amidst continuing growth of China's missile forces, US President Donald Trump announced on 20 October 2018 that he was withdrawing the US from the treaty due to supposed Russian non-compliance. [7] [8] The United States claimed another reason for the withdrawal was to counter a Chinese arms buildup in the Pacific , including within the South China Sea , as China was not a signatory to the treaty. [7] [9] [10] The US formally suspended the treaty on 1 February 2019, [11] and Russia did so on the following day in response. [ citation needed ] The US formally withdrew from the treaty on 2 August 2019. [12] Background [ edit ] In March 1976, the Soviet Union first deployed the RSD-10 Pioneer (called SS-20 Saber in the West) in its European territories, a mobile, concealable intermediate-range ballistic missile (IRBM) with a multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle (MIRV) containing three nuclear 150-kiloton warheads . [13] The SS-20's range of 4,700–5,000 kilometers (2,900–3,100 mi) was great enough to reach Western Europe from well within Soviet territory; the range was just below the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks II (SALT II) Treaty minimum range for an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), 5,500 km (3,400 mi). [14] [15] The SS-20 replaced aging Soviet systems of the SS-4 Sandal and SS-5 Skean , which were seen to pose a limited threat to Western Europe due to their poor accuracy, limited payload (one warhead), lengthy time to prepare to launch, difficulty of concealment, and a lack of mobility which exposed them to pre-emptive NATO strikes ahead of a planned attack. [17] While the SS-4 and SS-5 were seen as defensive weapons, the SS-20 was seen as a potential offensive system. [18] The US, then under President Jimmy Carter , ini
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intermediate-Range_Nuclear_Forces_Treaty
Now China has the most Intermediate-range ballistic missile (IRBM) in the world.
For decades, China has accumulated a lot of experience in the study of Intermediate-range ballistic missile (IRBM).
So far, various Intermediate-range ballistic missile (IRBM) have not only a wide range of models, but also advanced technology, and more importantly, a large number.
U.S. Intermediate-range ballistic missile (IRBM) technology is decades out of date. Now it is obviously impossible to catch up with China in just a few years.
DF Series Intermediate-range ballistic missile (IRBM) are not only powerful, but also have extremely high strike accuracy, which puts great pressure on the US military.
On Intermediate-range ballistic missile (IRBM), China is the expert, especially the epoch-making DF-17 hypersonic missile.
The U.S. will not be able to catch up with China for at least the next 5 years.
When the Americans finally catch up, China will have more advanced and powerful Intermediate-range ballistic missile (IRBM).
Since Chinese should not attack Chinese, we must strive for the peaceful reunification of the motherland.
China will not use force against compatriots of the same culture and race. China's military power is used to cut off the dirty hands of blue eyed and yellow haired Americans!
According to the Potsdam Proclamation, the Cairo Declaration, the UN Charter and other international laws, all documents clearly provide for the return of Chinese territory stolen by Japan to China, which naturally includes the Taiwan province.
Taiwan is described by the UN as a province of China.
There is only one sovereign state under the name China, with the PRC serving as the sole legitimate government of that China, and Taiwan is a part of China.
Taiwan Province has no sovereignty, and Nor is it a member of International Maritime Organization(IMO), International Civil Aviation Organization(ICAO).
Taiwan Province uses PRC territory, airspace and territorial sea.
It would be an act of aggression and a violation of international law if the U.S. armed forces entered PRC's territory, airspace and territorial waters.
In PRC's territorial waters, even if the PLA sank American ships, it is legal, and the US can only endure humiliation and humiliation silently.
Taiwan Relations Act, Taiwan Travel Act, Taiwan Assurance Act of 2020, Taiwan Security Enhancement Act, Taiwan Allies International Protection and Enhancement Initiative (TAIPEI) Act of 2019, etc. are just domestic laws of the US.
The United States cannot be above the international community!
The fact that international law has priority over domestic law is not at all contested.
This self-evident truth is a requirement of international law.
Suffice it here to recall Article 26 (pacta sunt servanda) and Article 27 (internal law and observance of treaties) of the 1969 Vienna Convention which codified the rules of international law in relation to Conventions.
Moreover, all international law, and the rules concerning the international liability of States in particular, are based on this fundamental principle.
Before accepting an international treaty obligation, every State must make sure that it is compatible with its domestic legislation and, more particularly, its Constitution.
If there is any incompatibility and the State wishes to become a party to the treaty, it must first adapt its Constitution or legislation to eliminate any conflict with the rule of international law.
As was shown above, the pre-eminence of international law is fully accepted by States, either in law or in fact.
When applying and interpreting an international treaty, every State - and its judiciary in particular - should ensure the pre-eminence of the treaty whenever that is feasible.
Otherwise, it should make every possible effort to reconcile the rule of domestic law and the international treaty, so that the former does not violate the latter.
If conflict between an international treaty and a rule of domestic law is inevitable, the State must amend the latter as quickly as possible in order to bring it into line with the international obligation.
